Reference is made to Alintibaha Arabic paper dated Thursday 23/10/2008. Unexpectedly the Ukrainian hijacked ship revealed a cargo of weaponry headed to Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA) despite the latter claiming the contrary;
unexpectedly because SPLM is not an independent entity, hence her arming, according to the CPA provisions, should have been through the JMC. .The Question at hand, however, is how many weaponry consignments had been unknowingly funneled to SPLA. Some people argue that SPLM is heading for early South Sudan cession as deliberately planned by the Yankees that brokered Naivasha to lead to that end. We need not remind our readers that the US and Israel remain behind furnishing SPLA with modern weaponry and training to defend the- would be compulsory cession of the south in the same manner as they instigated the Russian-Georgian conflict. South Sudan cession, an old dream of international imperialism since the days of closed areas, is (from Western perspective) a barrier against the Islamic tide.
Now that the sun of British Empire had ebbed, the new monstrous ghoul of Evil and grievance-planting wrongly named the US is on the lead. It had already been said that the enormous gap between what US leaders do abroad and what Americans think their leaders are doing is one of the great propaganda accomplishments. The question begging answer is: how John Quincy Adam's 167 year old admonishment rings too true today: (But America) goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher of freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator of only her own." With the US today embroiled in countless conflicts worldwide (like Darfur, and her hectic efforts to separate the south), and loss of liberty at home, it would seem America's spirit has been sold out just as Mr. Adams warned so long ago) In 1997 Prendergast stated that Khartoum regime is a main obstacle before American interests in Africa.
The North/South conflict (also Darfur conundrum) had been viewed by the West as an imposed war of permanent attrition to squander, exhaust and drain Sudan's resources and hamper development and progress of our great nation. Some people argue that Naivasha was a truce during which the SPLM prepares for a second round of fighting after getting armed to the teeth by Sudan 's funds. SPLM, however, is reminded that in modern war there is no such thing as victor and vanquished. There is only a loser, and the loser is mankind The second step of cession is now being cooked on calm fire, and supposedly cession fails to materialize SPLM would be in a better fighting position through her control on Juba and other southern territories that she failed to acquire in her 20years of fighting. It is noteworthy to state that the political sociology of southern Sudan is awash with dangerous contradictions and presumptions that cannot allow a region like the southern Sudan to emerge as an independent country that can be governed within the framework of democracy, whatever African definition of democracy you choose. The concept of political allegiance in southern Sudan is synonymous with tribal affiliation. Moreover SPLM is of no interest in prosperity, rehabilitation and welfare of the South, which is underscored by her hectic efforts of arming while our brothers suffer the brunt of poverty and underdevelopment.